| Due to the new advances in directional thrust | | | | as well as flying within a non-atmospheric tube of |
| capabilities and the advent of UAVs which can take | | | | plasma, created by pulsed waves in the direction of |
| higher “G” loadings, we need to design | | | | the intended flight to eliminate the friction from air. |
| aircraft and UAVs which have better turning | | | | Later models would also include an antigravity |
| capabilities. This would allow UAVs to fly between | | | | criss-crossed wave disruptions within such |
| city buildings like Felluhja or monitor down town areas | | | | non-atmospheric tubes for complete control, |
| like DC for crime. We can build better directional | | | | unbelievable acceleration, hovering and increased |
| thrust intake flows to allow jet engines to get | | | | useful loads once in flight. There are a few other |
| continual flows for full power and thrust a very slow | | | | interesting models, within the thinking phase of the |
| speed and extremely high angles of attack while | | | | concept, which are not so dissimilar to the Optica. |
| completely departing from the forward flowing | | | | The front observation fuselage component would be |
| relative wind. By doing this we can maintain high rates | | | | similar to the head of a bee and the thorax being the |
| of turns to dodge enemy fired missiles, maneuver in | | | | body or the engine in our model, but it would be |
| tight proximity of structures and obstacles while | | | | relatively thinner in design, more like a dragonfly in |
| staying on mission. | | | | length to width ratios, but of course with out the |
| To better understand a good starting point of this | | | | long wings to cut down on drag for higher speeds. |
| discussion and to better visualize in your mind the | | | | We envision swept canards on the front observation |
| basic concept building such a craft and the possible | | | | fuselage, which are much similar to that of a shark |
| shape it might have; below are some links to Pictures | | | | but horizontal and slightly curved upward to disrupt |
| of the possible general design we have in mind. In | | | | the air flow enough to keep any wing tip vortices |
| these pictures are previous no-pivoting versions of | | | | coming off them as the aircraft turns flowing directly |
| the basic design we have in mind. This aircraft is the | | | | into the engine since additional thrust will be needed |
| “Optica” and it was designed for high | | | | and intake ram air during intense flight maneuvers. |
| visibility, efficiency and STOL – Short Take-Off | | | | The front observation fuselage will not be perfectly |
| and Landing Capability. | | | | bulbus on it’s nose cone, but be more closer |
| Imagine this look and forward observation area with | | | | to a tropical fish than completely spherical looking like |
| a shortened swept wingspan in prospective to | | | | the ‘Opitca’ aircraft. This will allow for |
| relative size. The wing perhaps the shape of an A-4 | | | | more horizontal directional control in flight, as the |
| or even an F-104. | | | | aircraft front fuselage comes back towards the |
| In our model with the observation area, which could | | | | engine it will become more rounded to allow for |
| encompass a pilot or a set of sensors and/or video | | | | maximum and stable airflow into the turbine. The |
| monitors would be up front of the jet engine intake. | | | | engine component or middle fuselage will be 3.33 |
| The observation area would pivot, similar to a double | | | | times as long as the observation fuselage and will |
| length bus in some cities, much like a snake. Thus | | | | taper off aft-ward. Under the fuselage will be the |
| when the aircraft was to make a turn the relative | | | | wings, with landing gear apparatus. Since directional |
| wind would assist in the rapid turning as the fuselage | | | | thrust will assist in landing it will not have a substantial |
| observation component turned as it would push on | | | | landing gear like conventional aircraft. |
| the side. The front part of the fuselage would then | | | | The forward observation fuselage will be made of |
| force air around it into the intake as the air tried to | | | | composite, along with wings and rear fuselage along |
| get around it, while simultaneously opening a larger | | | | with a circle tail with a cross which will be the vertical |
| portion of the intake to the relative wind prior to | | | | and horizontal stabilizers which will pivot to assist the |
| turning allowing for maximum thrust to be maintained | | | | directional thrust exhaust nozzles, thus the directional |
| as the turn was entered. Such abilities and erratic | | | | thrust is blown across final tail assembly for stability |
| maneuverability would increase survival rates from | | | | and increased turning radius effectiveness as well as |
| SAMs – Surface to Air Missiles and other | | | | stability control. It will cost us about $35,000 to build |
| aircraft in dog fighting. We saw in the movie Matrix II | | | | a miniature version of this, which in turn could lend |
| that it was very difficult to hit and shoot down the | | | | itself well to battlefield observations in urban settings. |
| swarms of UAVs as they moved like snakes. The | | | | A full size human piloted version will run about |
| aircraft would also have the latest directional thrust | | | | $400,000 for a workable prototype. Although it |
| capabilities such as that of the hybrid F-16 with | | | | would take several prototypes to build a unit worthy |
| aerodynamic design to assist in trust vectoring | | | | of the aerodynamic innovation and an even larger |
| performance. To help you better appreciate this | | | | prototype to hold the weight of pulse wave |
| concept I would like you to view this photo as well: | | | | technologies for gravity wave disruptions and plasma |
| [ | | | | ionization, although well within the realm of possibilities |
| Our model will be similar but sleeker for high speeds, | | | | and modern technologies. |