Watering Woes in the Indian Bottled Water Industry - Creating and Protecting an Identity (Trademark)

dy">for either party to assert their dominance, while it is
Tussle over taming the grandeur of the highestthe onus of the courts to simultaneously ensure a
mountain range in the world for a commercial venturelevel playing field.
has reached the courtrooms. Aquifers nestled inCurrently pegged at Rs. 1000 - crore, the Indian
Himalayas have been used by the Tata Groupbottled water industry is projected to grow @ 40%
(previously Mount Everest Mineral Water Ltd.) andto touch Rs. 5000 - crore by 2010. The ingoing fight
Bisleri International to source a premium segment ofover establishing and protecting the identity of the
bottled water (enriched in minerals) as a launch-padpremium bottled water segment is mainly to create
to hoist their international flags and towards a nichean entry into foreign markets and thus define a global
uber-urban segment.presence. e.g. exploiting the US market which is
The trouble brews in the fact that 'Himalaya' is atouted to touch US$ 50 billion.
registered TradeMark with the Tatas. The counterViewpoint:
argument of Bisleri states that 'Himalaya' is a genericAny registered TradeMark is designed with an aspect
name. Both parties accessed the provisions of theto provide the basis, thrust, and most importantly, to
Indian Judicial System by raising their respectiveimpart a unique identity to a commodity (product
claims. More specifically, Ramesh Chauhan (chairman,service). Infringement of any registered TradeMark is
Bisleri International) has sought cancellation of Tata'ssubstantiated when it is proved beyond reasonable
Himalaya brand through a rectification application fileddoubt that the purported infringer has/is caused
with the Intellectual Appellate Board (IPAB), Chennai,causing confusion about the identity of the product,
based on the Geographical Indications Act whichwhich ought to be protected by the registered
forbids the registration of a geographical name by aTradeMark. Also, an infringement hints at the
private company.strength of the registered TradeMark in the market
Statistics' disclosures maintain that 'Himalaya' brandvis-à-vis its identification of the product and
mineral water, currently owned by the Tatas wasseemingly entices potential copiers to piggy-back on
bought over from Dadi Balsam (an NRI froman already paved way of the 'recognised' commodity.
Singapore) in 1991. The bottles formerly hadAn efficient judicial system enabled by strong laws
horizontally located circumferential ridges and squareand defined precedents need to be in place to
cross-sectional bottles. Bisleri, on the other handthwart such 'piggy-backing' attempts.
kicked off their premium segment edition inA further objection could be raised wherein, the very
December, 2006. They have only recentlyidentity of the product is threatened i.e. whether a
accelerated their marketing of said product. Visually,mark/word(s) ought to be the subject matter in the
the bottles are unribbed/unridged carrying a verticalfirst pace.
label called 'Himalayan' (and in small descriptive fontApropos the bottled water industry, indicative graphs
'from the Himalayas').[1] clearly point out the increasing demand in a
While the matter was heard in courts on June 23rddeveloping nation like India.
and June 24th, 2008, an interim arrangement hasPrimarily, for this reason, the cross-tracking attempts
been sought by both parties whereby, Bisleri hasand attempts to create well-defined, non-confusing
agreed to stop using the domain 'bislerihimalayan.com'niches within the juxtaposed players of the same
It will continue to market water bottles that saymarket, a non-generic identity mark is of paramount
'from the Himalayas' as a descriptive mark in smallimportance.
font to denote the origin of the water. It has alsoWhile it remains clear that 'Himalaya' is a generic name
agreed to inform its stockists about theseand a geographical location (and hence, not a subject
arrangements. Come October, and a judgment willmatter of a TradeMark registration), it remains to be
hopefully be doled out.seen if its derivative factions such as 'Himalayan' or
Representative Advocates:the like withstand the turbulence caused in respect of
- for Tatas: Fali S. Narimanthis case, and attract favourable judgment, thereto,
- for Bisleri: AS Chandhiokthus egging other players to register such
Crunching Business Parameters:TradeMarks, and its plausible complications arising out
The numbers game disclosing current and potentialof methods of distinction of such distinctive marks.
marketing trends and statistics are the driving force